What's New

File Size:
86.94 kB

13 September 2013

Our primary concern with the major development assessment process comes from the fact that Australia has a number of pieces of State and Commonwealth legislation that control development while aiming to protect the environment. It is encouraging that the Commission's draft report highlights the problems with a duplicative assessment system and recommends changes consistent with those suggested by the Urban Taskforce.

File Size:
76.01 kB

16 August 2013

We support an approach to planning where key precincts are identified and then site  specific planning is carried out to enable the amendment of a Local Environmental Plan to permit otherwise prohibited development.  We are encouraged to note that the Wentworth Point Urban Activation Precinct Proposal states that flexible planning controls are proposed to guide development.  This idea of flexibility is supported by the adoption of a mixed use zoning across the majority of the precinct.

File Size:
445.78 kB

23 August 2013

The Broader WSEA is a vast area which requires bold planning and significant government investment to drive development outcomes, supporting growth and investment.  We urge the Government to maintain a sense of urgency by ensuring that local environmental plans are amended and infrastructure provided as a matter of priority. 


File Size:
63.02 kB

12 August 2013

The Draft Oxford Falls Valley and Belrose North Strategic Review considers the development controls that currently apply to land under Warringah Local Environmental Plan (LEP) 2000 to allow this land to be brought into Warringah LEP 2011. The vast majority of the land is to be zoned E3 Environmental Management. we are cautious with the application of a land use zone that may result in existing  permitted land uses becoming prohibited. Some land that is to be zoned E3 has been cleared for agricultural type uses and/or is currently used for such use. We argue that the application of an E3 zone in such circumstance is not an appropriate planning response.

File Size:
114.36 kB

19 August 2013

The Urban Taskforce understands that the draft Botany Bay Dev and replace all the existing plans and policies that apply to the majority land within the City of Botany Bay. We generally support efforts made by councils to consolidate plans, thereby removing some of the complexity from the planning process. We also see great value in this process as it often results in a review and refinement of development controls. However, upon review of your draft plan, a number of proposed controls raise serious concerns.

File Size:
113.30 kB

08 August 2013

The Urban Taskforce welcomes the Governments continued review of the Land Acquisition (JustTerms Compensation) Act 1991 ("the Act"). It is encouraging to note that the recently released JustTerms Compensation Legislation Consultation Paper (the consultation paper) acknowledges thatthere is general concern with the impacts of compulsory acquisition of private land and notes theprevious comments from the Urban Taskforce provided via correspondence dated 15th June 2012.

File Size:
27.39 kB

08 July 2013

Click on image below to view video:



File Size:
99.22 kB

08 July 2013

We are pleased to note that the draft Employment Lands Strategy partly supports our view and does not maintain a traditional general industrial zoning across the majority of the area but introduces areas of mixed use and mixed business. However, it is disappointing that the application of mixed use throughout the entire area has not been pursued.  We strongly suggest that the Employment Lands strategy be focused on the implementation of a more flexible, multi-purpose employment zoning as suggested in the Green Paper and White Paper across the entire study area.

File Size:
426.28 kB

28 June 2013

The Urban Taskforce generally supports the direction of the White Paper and the reform of the planning system for New South Wales.  We support the proposal to repeal outdated and/or irrelevant state planning policies and local environmental plans.  We need a simpler and fairer method of funding infrastructure that spreads levies across the broadest base of beneficiaries.